logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 07. 12. 선고 2018두41051 판결
(심리불속행)상시 거주하지 않고‘별장’용도로 활용한 아파트는 주택으로 봄.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2017Nu86271 (Seoul High Court 2018.03.27)

Title

The apartment houses that are used for the purpose of "a villa" without residing at the time of (psyching) are deemed to be housing.

Summary

Even if the apartment was used for a separate purpose, there is no non-taxable practice that considers it as not a house in the application of non-taxation on the transfer income tax of one house for one household in the same case as the house at issue.

Related statutes

Article 89 of the Income Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow