logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2014.08.27 2014고단311
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a Crens car.

On November 22, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 16:45 on November 22, 2013, and driven the front road of the Han Man-dong, Busan, Daegu, Busan, along the three-lanes between the three-lanes from the third-lane boundary to the marine traffic zone.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the front left and accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim D (the age of 15) who crosses the road on the left side from the right side of the moving direction to the left side, and was negligent in driving the said vehicle as it is, which led to shocking the victim into the right side of the said vehicle.

After all, when the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as saved salt saves requiring treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without any measure, even though necessary measures such as aiding the victim.

2. Determination

A. According to the record of the non-guilty portion, the defendant was waiting for the signal in front of the crosswalk at one lane of the three-lanes of the accident vehicle and waiting for the signal in front of the crosswalk. Following the alteration of the signal, the defendant got into front of the middle part of the vehicle at the time when the defendant started driving, and the part where the victim gets into front of the road at the time when the defendant started driving, and the vehicle was temporarily stopped, but the victim temporarily suspended the vehicle, but the victim continued to occupy the crosswalk at the time, and the vehicle driving signal is continuing at the time, and the defendant was waiting for the vehicle at the time of the accident, and the vehicle was driven by about five minutes after the accident. At the time of the accident, the victim was already getting out of the bus.

arrow