1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 29, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of 1.5 million won or more as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Busan District Court's branch court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's branch court's order, and on April 26, 201, a fine of 5 million won or more as a violation of the Road Traffic Act was imposed by the Busan District Court's Busan District Court's branch court's summary order.

Although the Defendant had been punished twice or more due to the Road Traffic Act as above, at around 00:30 on July 07, 2016, the Defendant driven a d SM7 car under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.096% of alcohol leveling to approximately 600 meters from the front road of the head of the Oba Ban located in the Busan Metropolitan Man-gu Man-dong, Busan Metropolitan City, to the front road of the traffic distance in the same Dong.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a DSS7 car.

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.096% at the same time as that of the preceding paragraph, driven the said car, and proceeded with the traffic distance at the Donri-dong, Busan, Daegu, Busan, along with a single-lane distance from the surface of the Gu's marine transportation airspace to the west of the upper Tri-distance.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care for those engaged in driving service to thoroughly see the front hour and to safely drive the signal in such cases.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, tried to drive at a speed to gather drinking control by neglecting it and driving it as is, due to negligence in violation of the signal, was driven by the victim E (the age of 35) who was driven in accordance with the straight line at the right intersection due to the driver’s negligence, was driven by the front part of the above SM7 car driven by the Defendant, and the above re-scheduled car is pushed by the front part of the above SM7 car driven by the Defendant, and the above re-scheduled car is pushed to the right side, and the front part of the HMW car driven by the victim G (the age of 36) driving in the same direction is shocked.