logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.11 2016가단5155648
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 8,838,107 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from March 9, 2016 to August 11, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into an insurance contract with Nonparty A and the Seoul Yangcheon-gu Seoul Housing B B, building No. 201 (hereinafter “instant housing”), and general household goods to compensate for the damage, etc. caused by fire. Defendant Esck Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Esck”) is a company engaged in the business of electronic and electrical equipment manufacturing and selling, such as a food washing machine, etc., and Defendant Agricultural Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Agricultural Co., Ltd.”) entered into a contract with Defendant Esc and insurance period from October 15, 2015 to October 15, 2016, with the product damage liability insurance amounting to KRW 300,000 per accident.

B. From January 25, 2016 to around 2004 on the same day, when purchasing one food washing machine manufactured by Defendant SK (hereinafter “instant food washing machine”) and being installed and used on the house of this case, A operated the said food washing machine at around 21:59 on January 25, 2016, and then out the house, and then out the house, and then out the house, and caused a fire without any way to the house, and the inside ceiling of the house was set up against the house, and the household was destroyed.

(hereinafter “instant fire”). C.

On March 8, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 33,101,826 (i.e., KRW 50,000,00, KRW 10,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 23,101,826 (i.e., KRW 23,101,826) (i., KRW 10,00, KRW 10,00) to the Plaintiff, who was requested to assess the amount of damages on the instant housing.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the purpose of the whole pleading

2. The parties' assertion

A. The fire of this case, which is the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim, is exclusively controlled by Defendant Sk.

arrow