logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.10.13 2017고단850
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

2017 No person shall transfer or take over any access medium.

Nevertheless, the Defendant transferred the access media by giving one head of Tong and one check card connected to the Korean-style Investment Securities Account (500-056323-11) in front of a lot in front of a lot in the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu., the Defendant transferred the access media by giving one head of Tong and one check card connected to the (50-056323-11).

2017 No person shall transfer any access medium.

피고인의 동생 E은 ‘ 유령 법인’ 명의의 계좌를 개설하여 이를 사설 스포츠 토토 운영자 등에게 판매하기로 마음먹고, 2015. 말경부터 2016. 초경 사이에 3~5 회에 걸쳐 피고인에게 주식회사 엡솔 네트 웍스 명의의 위임장, 사업자등록증, 인감 증명서 등을 건네주면서, ‘ 나도 누군가에게 부탁을 받은 것인데, 형님이 나 대신에 계좌를 개설하여 내게 달라’ 고 부탁하였다.

In response to the above E’s request, around February 15, 2016, the Defendant visited the branch office of Korea bank in the unification of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and misrepresented the employees of the said company, opened the said company’s account (1005-302-92058) with the power of attorney, etc. in the name of the said company, and opened the above company’s account (1005-302-92058) with the name of the said company, and sent the passbook, check card, andOTP connected to the said account to E.

After all, E promised to receive KRW 1.2 million per month from the user fee per account of passbook, e-mail card, etc. connected to the above account, and sold it to the operator of the private sports entertainment site.

As a result, the Defendant was able to facilitate the violation of the E Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

Summary of Evidence

2017 Highest 850

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The document of F;

1. Search and seizure inspection warrant reply (2016-4853) 2017 order 1574;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. To inquire into personal information of customers, to certificates of deposit transaction records, etc.;

arrow