logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.10.17 2014나3029
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 11, 2011, the Plaintiff suffered from the second right knife at the right knife (hereinafter “instant wife”). The Plaintiff immediately sought to treat the instant wife, which Defendant B operates, to the “Nwon” located in the Southern-gu Seoul metropolitan area S.

B. From November 11, 201 to April 14, 201, the Plaintiff received treatment, such as the disinfection of the satise, without being satisfy in preparation for the outbreak of salt from Defendant B, and received treatment, such as medication for the satisfying of salt, but rather, the satis and pain have deteriorated on the satisfy.

C. Upon the aggravation of symptoms, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the “O Hospital” located in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City T on November 15, 201, and the Plaintiff was under search and dyeculous medication (the removal of contaminated organizations and contaminated organizations and exposure to the surrounding healthy organizations) from the Defendant C, a doctor belonging to the O Hospital, on the 16th day of the same month, and the symptoms continued to worsen.

On November 17, 2011, Defendant C requested a Green Cross to conduct a spawn test on the germs collected at the time of the spawn emulation. On the 23th day of the same month, Defendant C considered the spatococus as the spacus angosus.

E. The Plaintiff returned to the Jeonnam University Hospital on November 19, 201. On two occasions on two occasions on the 21st and 25th of the same month, the Plaintiff was undergoing a washing and duplicating surgery, but the symptoms were not improved, and the Plaintiff was in a state of cutting off the 2nd of the current right balance on December 6, 201.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Gap evidence No. 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. On November 11, 201, Defendant B: (a) although Defendant B confirmed the fact that the instant wife was the heat copier of the Plaintiff’s body, Defendant B was infected with the Plaintiff’s upper part of the body by failing to conduct a spawn test by November 14, 201 where salt was generated, and the Plaintiff’s upper part was infected with the spawnosis.

arrow