The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is the case where the defendant had induced job seekers who wish to transport cargo to purchase high-class cargo and acquired the transportation brokerage fee by deceiving them to pay transportation fee, without paying transportation fee, and the victims who resist this case committed fraud and embezzlement over several occasions, such as deceiving the truck again as if they would sell the truck again, deceiving the truck itself, or embezzlement the sales proceeds of the truck, etc. In addition, the victims of this case committed each of the crimes of this case for a considerable period of time, as well as continuously committed each of the crimes of this case for a considerable period of time, and it seems that there was a great difficulty in the livelihood of victims who are ordinary ordinary people due to each of the crimes of this case. Considering this point, the defendant's liability for the crime of this case is considerably heavy, considering the fact that there was a history of criminal punishment several times including the same criminal records of the defendant, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive and circumstances after the crime, the defendant's argument that the defendant's punishment of this case was too unfair even if considering the circumstances of the court below's appeal and the defendant's sentencing were not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.