logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.06.28 2018고정55
협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is currently serving as the wife of the victim B ( South, 35 years old) who was married for 6 years.

1. On January 3, 2017, the Defendant calls to the victim, who is the husband who is working at the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul-si, and the husband who is working at his home, and calls for a certificate of personal seal impression for the notarial deeds in the Property Division Agreement, and disputes at the end, the Defendant has received the seal impression, the seal impression, and the seal impression.

It is the same that it is impossible to receive the same as it is, and thereafter, to make a phone call to the N company.” and “No phone is made by a Hand-phone.”

D. At one hour, a company must continue to call. It is the same as the one that cannot be inside, and if the injured person does not issue a certificate of his/her seal imprint, he/she repeatedly calls to the company as if the injured person would damage the reputation of the injured person within the company.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the above victim.

2. 피고 인은 위 1 항과 같은 날 11:40 경 서울 종로구 E에 있는, ㈜F에서 근무 중인 피해자의 휴대폰 (G )으로 전화를 하여 위 1 항과 같은 이유로 다투던 끝에, “ 너 이 전화 끊지 나 계속 회사에 전화할 거야. 오늘 엄청 한가하거든, 일 하나도 없어서. 계속 회사에 전화할 거야. 계속. 니 직원들이 다 일 못하게 계속, 계속. 회사 전화를 아무도 뭣도 못하게 계속, 계속 전화할 거야.” 라며 전화를 피할 경우 반복적으로 전화하여 회사 내에서 피해자의 업무를 방해하거나, 그의 평판을 훼손할 것처럼 겁을 주었다.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the above victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the transcript of the evidence attached to the written complaint [the defendant and his defense counsel are merely expressing emotional humiliations or temporary labor with a strong emotional testimony during a marital fighting with the victim and his/her husband and wife, without intimidation.

However, this Court is legitimate.

arrow