logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.10.16 2020나40447
건물명도(인도)
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the plaintiff submitted evidence in the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance can be acknowledged as legitimate, even if the plaintiff submitted additional evidence

(2) The main issue of the instant case is whether the term of the loan agreement between the Plaintiff and C is terminated, and the term of the loan agreement between the Plaintiff and C on the instant building does not expire, and it cannot be deemed that the period sufficient to use and benefit has expired, and thus, the first instance court, which judged that the Plaintiff does not have the right to terminate the loan agreement on the instant building, is justifiable, and thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

arrow