logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.05.03 2018고단2559
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an employee of the Bamotour in Gyeonggi-gu, and the victim C is a person who operates a laundry near the above Motour, the victim D is a long-term person of the above Motour, and the victim E is an employee of the above Motour

1. Around December 5, 2008, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that “The victim shall be repaid with a certain amount of 100,000 won borrowed from his/her father-child assistant” to the victim.

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, it was thought that he would use it as his own cost of living, and there was no idea to use it as his relative assistance, and there was no intention or ability to repay it because there was no specific property to the extent that it did not have any living expenses at the time.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 100,000 from the victim, in cash, from the victim, and received KRW 670,000 from that time to December 2, 2008, a total of 4 times, as shown in the annexed Crime List (1).

2. On August 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay off 300,000 won if the Defendant borrowed 300,000 won to the victim because of the lack of the expense for life-saving,” at the above Moel.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, he did not think that he would use it for his own cost of living, and there was no intention or ability to repay it without any specific property to the extent that he did not have any living expenses at the time.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 300,000 won in cash from the victim's place, and from that time until December 5, 2008, received 3.2 million won in total on seven occasions, as shown in the annexed Crime List (2) from the victim, and acquired it by deception.

3. The Defendant’s fraud against the victim E in around August 18, 2008 is a professor of the U.S. to the victim at the her mother’s meeting.

arrow