Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 16, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the Daegu District Court’s Ansan Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu District Court on May 23, 2007. ② On November 14, 2008, the Daegu District Court sentenced two years of suspended execution to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 30, 2009. ③ On October 16, 2018, the Daegu District Court sentenced two years of suspended execution to 8 months of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Public Official Election Act from the Daegu District Court’s Kimcheon Branch for the crime of violating the Public Official Election Act, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around July 23, 2009, the Defendant stated that “A road work and civil engineering work ordered by the LH Corporation to Gyeonggi-do,” the victim D at the non-chairperson office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dongdaemun-gu Office for the crime of 2009, stating that this case is a different story with persons who are LH Corporation and can receive the payment of the money immediately.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not think of using the money borrowed from the victim as expenses related to receiving orders from the Corporation, and was thought to use the money for all the cost of living. At the time of bad credit, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 18,00,000 from the victim to the F Bank account (number G) in the name of the Defendant’s wife E on the same day, and received KRW 8,000,000 on two occasions, and received KRW 10,00,000 from the F Bank Lao branch located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a check on August 7, 2009.

2. From April 10 to April 2011, 201, the Defendant stated that “A victim D shall be paid a full payment, if it is necessary for business.”

However, the defendant did not think that he would use the money borrowed from the victim as a business fund, and all of the living expenses.