A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 8. 24. 01:33경 서울 B에 있는 C편의점 앞 노상에서, 피고인이 위 편의점에서 행패를 부린다는 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울광진경찰서 D지구대 소속 경찰관 E가 피고인에게 신원확인을 요구하자, “야 개새끼야, 내가 뭘 잘못했냐”라고 욕을 하고 양손으로 위 경찰관을 밀쳐 폭행하여 경찰관의 범죄 예방 및 수사, 공공의 안녕과 질서 유지에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the F Statements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The Defendant is subject to criticism in light of the following: (a) the basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties ( June-1 and 4) [Pronouncement Decision]; (b) the use of violence against police officers without any reason; and (c) the failure from the victim.

However, it is judged as ordered in consideration of all kinds of sentencing conditions, such as the fact that it appears to have reached the crime of this case by contingently, that there is no record of punishment other than the punishment of fine of 2 million won in 2004, that it has been divided in depth, the age of the defendant, etc.