logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.10.06 2016고단1922
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 20, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 for a fine of KRW 1,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court Branch on August 20, 207, on March 10, 2009, a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) by the same court on March 10, 209, and on July 15, 2016, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

On August 6, 2016, the Defendant, as a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act two or more times, driven a B-hurbd motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol 0.132% without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 200 meters of blood alcohol level from the road near the 1st line transmission in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si to the 43rd side of the same city, to the road in front of 246 front day of the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving without a license, report on the circumstances of driving without a license, report on the circumstances of driving with a driving without a license, report on the use of a drinking measuring instrument, register of driver's licenses, and inquiry into the car

1. Control photographs;

1. Records before judgment: Application of inquiry reports, such as criminal records, etc., amounts of dispositions, and reporting results of confirmation Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has a record of being sentenced to four times a fine due to the crime of drunk driving, and the necessity for the punishment of severe punishment is high in that the defendant committed the crime of this case again without being aware of it during the period of probation due to the crime of rape, on the other hand, the defendant reflects his mistake in depth, the defendant has no record of being sentenced to imprisonment or heavier punishment for the same kind, and the circumstances leading to the crime of this case by the defendant.

arrow