logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.23 2017가단5050566
분양대금반환청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 31, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract for 505 (hereinafter “instant real estate sales contract”) out of the “D hotel” on the ground of Pyeongtaek-si (hereinafter “instant hotel”), 161,69,500 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), 16,169,950 (hereinafter “the instant contract”), 16,960, 169, 160, 169, 169, 160, 169, 169, 169, 169, 160, 169, 160, 169, 169, 160, 169, 160, 169, 160, 169, 169, 160, 169, 169, 169, 160, 196, 196, 196, 1606, 196, 16, 160.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

“A” means the Defendant;

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

(2) When this contract is terminated due to a cause falling under Article 3(3), “A” shall be paid 10% of the total supply price as penalty to “B”. Article 7(6) of the Act provides that “B” shall either repay the loan before the entry into the room or convert it into a secured loan.

arrow