logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2017.06.01 2015가단47100
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that: (a) around July 2015, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with mountain ginseng equivalent to KRW 6,00,000, KRW 3,000, KRW 25 years, KRW 3,000, KRW 5,000, and KRW 5,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 1,065,000, around July 22, 2015; (b) mountain ginseng equivalent to KRW 1,065,00, KRW 00, KRW 1,500, KRW 00, KRW 1,500, KRW 1,500, KRW 00, KRW 1,000, KRW 1,000, KRW 1,000, KRW 1,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 5,000, KRW 7,005, KRW 1,005, KRW 205,37,005.

The defendant, without any intention or ability to pay the above mountain ginseng, etc., was supplied with mountain ginseng, etc. equivalent to the sum of KRW 24,710,000 from the plaintiff as above and infringed upon the plaintiff's house without permission, thereby thefting articles equivalent to KRW 400,000. The defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the aggregate of the above price of goods and the price of goods stolen to the plaintiff.

2. We examine the judgment, and find it difficult to acknowledge that the defendant unilaterally did not submit the documents prepared by the plaintiff or entered in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6 stating general appraisal price or sale price, not the agreed supply price, led to 25,110,00 won in the amount of the goods to be paid to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's assertion is not accepted because there is no other objective evidence to acknowledge it.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow