Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 8, 2015, around 20:00, the Defendant: (a) ordered the victim’s “E” of the victim’s D operation on the 20:00 Jeju-si, Da, and 1st century with two fluences; (b) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by ordering the victim’s “E”); (c) drinking fluencing, etc.; (d) drinking fluencing fluor, without any justifiable reason, after drinking fluencing fluence; and (d) spiting the victim’s fluence on the part of the victim; and (e) spiting the victim

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. On November 8, 2015, the Defendant, upon receipt of a report on a failure of driving at around the week on around November 2015, 20:38, was dispatched to the said restaurant, and was called the said restaurant, from Gman affiliated with the F District of the Police Station of the Jeju Dong Police Station, whether he can pay food costs.

G, upon receiving the question of “W,” expressed that “W” was “W,” and made a threat to G, as the G may be, on the part of G, with a strong hand, to the effect that “W.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

B. On November 8, 2015, the Defendant received a notice of the fact of conducting the physical examination from the slope H affiliated with the above police station at the metropolitan detention room in the Jeju Dong-dong Police Station in the Jeju-dong Police Station on November 22:30, 2015, and the Defendant received a physical examination from H

Around 22:43 on the same day, he/she threatened H by stating that “Iskicker in the police” means “Iskicker in the police,” and assault H to the face of H, while continuing to conduct a physical examination at around 22:43 on the same day, and immediately before being admitted to a detention room.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute of D or H’s written statement;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), the choice of each fine (the fact of crime is recognized and reflected, and the victim of interference with business is the victim.