1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,190,39 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from February 22, 2012 to September 18, 2019, and September 19, 201.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing automobile interior goods, etc., and the plaintiff is an employee of the defendant company since May 19, 2008, and was engaged in the business related to automobile parts.

B. At around 11:30 on May 26, 2008, the Plaintiff was faced with an accident that was forced by a pressese using a pressese machine (the name "Fsonson"; hereinafter referred to as " pressese machine") at the Defendant's workplace located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as the "instant workplace") and was engaged in nuclear power foundation work, and the right hand of the presses machine was able to be able to be able to be able to go into the pressese (hereinafter referred to as "the instant accident").

C. The Plaintiff was injured by the instant accident, such as the instant accident, which caused the injury to the water tank, the water tank, the water tank, the water tank, and the water tank, the water tank damage to the right part, the water tank, and the hydrotension damage to the water tank, the water tank and the water tank, and the water tank damage to the water surface part, and the dynamics section. On July 20, 2010, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the clinical symptoms of the national station in Ulsan-gu E Hospital located in Ulsan-gu and Ulsan-gu with the symptoms of combined typhism in light of radiation opinions. On the 22th day of the same month, at the advisory deliberation committee of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation affiliated with the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, the Plaintiff was sentenced to an additional injury and injury to the right part, the water surface part, the water surface part and the water surface part, the water surface part, and the water surface part and the water surface part, and was approved by the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation as an additional accident.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Evidence Nos. 1 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The gist of the parties’ assertion 1 is that the Plaintiff, as an employer employed by the Plaintiff, has a duty to manage and supervise a dangerous work site in order to prevent safety accidents against workers and to take necessary measures so that the Plaintiff, who is a worker, is not in danger to the life and body,