beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 84,250,641 as well as 5% per annum from December 11, 2012 to October 24, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 11, 2012, while the Plaintiff was engaged in the work using press machines at the Defendant’s workplace located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Inc., a temporary work agency business owner, (hereinafter “instant workplace”). On December 11, 2012, the Plaintiff suffered from an accident where the presses and the Plaintiff’s two descendants were kid between the presses (hereinafter “instant accident”). As a result, the Plaintiff suffered from both sides pressure damage damage damage damage caused by both sides, the number of left parts and water parts, the right side, the upper part, the 2,5 water side, the 3, and the 4 balance of raw materials and 4 balance. (hereinafter “instant disaster”).
B. There exists each operation trend on the left side and the right side of the press machine (hereinafter “instant press machine”) in which the instant press machine occurred, and there exists a operating center on the press machine left and right side of the press machine (hereinafter “instant press machine”). In order to get presses down, each of the operation trends should be divided into the press machine left and right side of the press machine (hereinafter “instant press machine”). When there is an object between the operation center and the press, each of the operation trends should not be divided into two parts, and if there is an object between the operation center, each of the operation trends can not be cut off. After the operation of the press machine, each of the operation trends can no longer stop until the stop.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry or video of Gap evidence 1, 2, and 8, the result of the verification by this court, appraiser D and E, the result of each appraisal by appraiser D and E, the fact inquiry by the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The Defendant, a user company who is dispatched from a temporary agency worker to use the temporary agency worker, is obligated to prevent the Plaintiff, who is the temporary agency worker, from being exposed from the risks likely to occur from the mechanical press machine inside the instant workplace.