1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts to be cited or added as follows, and the part to be emphasized by the court of first instance or additionally claimed by the plaintiff, and thus, citing it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

(2) In addition, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion, even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance trial were examined, did not differ from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial, and the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable. [The part to be cited or added] If the court of first instance grants permission on two pages 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the court of first instance added “after F obtained permission,” which read “after which, on January 28, 2014, changed the founder of the instant hospital from E to F, the court of first instance to obtain permission for change.”

If the judgment of the court of first instance 2th, the 16th representative "F from F to B" is deemed as "F to A (B) by a medical corporation.

On August 12, 2014, the first instance judgment 2nd 17th 2nd 17th 17th 17th 201, “the Defendant was able to change the establishment of the medical institution and add the beds.”

From three pages of the judgment of the first instance court, "No. 14" is deemed to be "No. 14, 24, 25".

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance is 13 and 14 as the former Medical Service Act (amended by Act No. 13599, Dec. 22, 2015); and the former Medical Service Act (amended by Act No. 13599, Dec. 22, 2015; hereinafter “former Medical Service Act”).

5 and 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “The former Enforcement Rule of the Medical Service Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 317, May 29, 2015)” is “the former Enforcement Rule of the Medical Service Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 317, May 29, 2015; hereinafter “former Enforcement Rule of the Medical Service Act”).

The judgment of the court of first instance.