All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and the counterclaim filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

1. The plaintiff and the defendant's grounds for appeal are not significantly different from each of the allegations in the first instance trial, and there is a question as to whether the defendant directly claims compensation and allocation of damages for the operation of the company of this case under the title "specific grounds for appeal and alteration of the grounds for appeal" in the statement of reasons for appeal, and it is not an exchange of the grounds for appeal by stating that non-10 million won is sought by subrogation of the company of this case, but the defendant does not express an exchange change of the grounds for appeal, and the defendant's assertion in the statement of reasons for appeal is in fact identical to the allegations in the first instance trial, it is reasonable to view that the grounds for appeal by the defendant are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance trial rather than an exchange change of the grounds for appeal. Accordingly, it is determined on this premise.

Even if the evidence submitted in the first instance trial is different from the evidence submitted in this court, it is recognized that the facts of the first instance deliberation and the judgment are legitimate.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing it by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate. Thus, each appeal by the plaintiff and the defendant is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.