logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1989. 7. 25. 선고 88누10794 판결
[법인세등부과처분취소][공1989.9.15.(856),1308]
Main Issues

Requirements for a school foundation to be exempted from special surtax pursuant to Article 59-3 (2) 3 of the Corporate Tax Act

Summary of Judgment

In order to be exempted from the special surtax on any income accruing from the transfer of the basic property owned by a school foundation established under the Private School Act for the purpose of using it for educational business, the application for exemption from the special surtax shall be submitted within the reporting period of the tax base, tax amount and tax amount as stipulated in Article 26 of the Corporate Tax Act.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 59-3 (2) 3, Article 59-3 (3) of the Corporate Tax Act, Article 124-8 (4) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Attorney Park Young-chul et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Defendant, United States Appellant

Head of the Do Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 88Gu6582 delivered on September 28, 1988

Notes

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Due to this reason

We examine the grounds of appeal.

Article 59-3 (2) 3 of the Corporate Tax Act provides that any income accruing from the transfer of basic property owned by a school foundation established under the Private School Act for the purpose of using it for educational business shall be exempted from special surtax under the conditions as prescribed by the Presidential Decree. Paragraph (3) of the same Article provides that "the provisions of paragraph (2) shall apply only where an application is filed under the conditions as prescribed by the Presidential Decree." Article 124-8 (4) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act provides that "a corporation which intends to be exempted from special surtax pursuant to Article 59-3 (2) 3 of the Act shall submit an application for exemption from special surtax as prescribed by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance and Economy along with the tax base return of corporate tax for the business year to which the transfer date belongs." In light of the purport of the above provision, if it intends to be exempted from special surtax on income accruing from the transfer of basic property owned by a school foundation established under the Private School Act for the purpose of using it for educational business, it shall submit an application for exemption from special surtax within the report period.

In the same purport, the court below recognized the fact that the plaintiff, a school juristic person established under the Private School Act, sold real estate to the non-party on January 24, 1984, which is the basic property owned by him, after the expiration of the tax base return period for the business year to which the above transfer date belongs under Article 26 of the Corporate Tax Act, the plaintiff submitted the application for the exemption of the above special surtax to the defendant only after June 22, 1988. Thus, it is proper to determine that the plaintiff cannot be exempted from the special surtax, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed and the costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Song Man-man (Presiding Justice)

arrow