Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On February 7, 2017, at around 05:48, the Defendant driven a F-distance intersection in front of the “E Gas station” in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and went through the direction of the inspection team in the direction of Kimpo-si in the direction of the inspection team at the time of Kimpo-si. On the other hand, the Defendant: (a) on February 7, 2017, the Defendant stopped the said vehicle on three-lanes above in front of the “K cafeteria” located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, where he was carrying out patrols, and (b) the Defendant discovered the Defendant’s signal violation as above; and (c) demanded the Defendant to stop the said vehicle on the other side of the “K cafeteria” located in Seo-gu Incheon, Incheon, at around 05:51, on February 7, 2017.

At that place, Defendant 1 to Scman I whether “scison from a new wall to Scandon”;

The above police officer rejected it and demanded the driver's license of a motor vehicle to display it, and held the driver's license while taking the bath, and eventually, the defendant, who is a dangerous object, operated the vehicle as the second line without holding any interest in regulating the above signal violation in order to receive a penalty payment notification from the above police officer, and attached it close to the right side of the above patrol vehicle by operating the vehicle as the second line, which is a dangerous object. The signal did not turn on the direction of a green change, and the above patrol vehicle was carried out without turning on the direction of a green change.

16,600 won of the repair cost was damaged to the extent that the 116,600 won was damaged to the extent that the 3rd line was replaced with the car, and the 116,600 won was used to assault the patrol vehicle's driver's click part, which was clicked with the driver's click part of the said patrol vehicle's click.

Accordingly, the Defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning police officers' patrols, etc., and damaged things used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (attached estimates for patrol vehicles);

1. The corresponding criminal provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime; and