1. The judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiffs' claims extended by this court, is modified as follows.

The approval and public notice of the district plan for the ruling - The project name: the project implementer of the Bogeumjari Housing District Development Project (H district first; hereinafter referred to as the "project in this case"): the defendant - the project implementer: the defendant - the project site - the 1,190,021 square meters - the date of public notice and the number: the JJ publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on October 14, 2008, the KK on October 1, 2009, and the ruling of expropriation on May 13, 201 (hereinafter referred to as the "adjudication of expropriation"): the date of expropriation of the L Central Land Tribunal on May 13, 201 (hereinafter referred to as the "adjudication of expropriation"): the date of expropriation on July 6, 2011: the list of land "the same shall apply to the list" in attached Form 1.

(1) In light of the aforementioned legal principles, “compensation for the adjudication of expropriation” in the attached Form 2 “ Results of the adjudication of expropriation” (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”) based on the arithmetic mean of the appraisal results of the land appraisal corporation, T-O land, P land, Q land, and R land is a site for a driving practice of a motor vehicle, and thus, the compensation should be assessed on the basis of “the answer” presumed to be used at the time of changing the form and quality, as indicated in the “the result of the adjudication of expropriation” in the attached Table 2 “the appraisal of expropriation” (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”) and “the result of the appraisal of expropriation”). As indicated in the “the appraisal of expropriation”, the Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on October 28, 2011 (hereinafter “the adjudication of expropriation”) on the basis of the computation of compensation as indicated in the “the appraisal of expropriation”. The Plaintiffs’ assertion that each compensation should be assessed on the premise that the present status of the use of the above land is a site at the time of changing the form and quality.

【In the absence of dispute, each entry and pleading of Gap's Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and Eul's No. 1, 2, and 3 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) are made.