The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the recognition of and against the instant criminal act, and the Defendant deposited KRW 1 million for the victim at the trial of the party, but the Defendant was already punished several times for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant’s sentence to commit the instant crime again during the repeated crime without being aware of the past record even though having been sentenced, is inevitable. In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family environment, motive, background, means, method, and consequence leading to the instant crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) cannot be deemed to be unfair, because it is too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.