logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1969. 12. 30. 선고 69다1604 판결
[손해배상][집17(4)민,267]
Main Issues

If the base of a tent booms in the light of coal, it is reasonable to presume that the accident was caused by the defect of facilities that did not fulfill the duty of preventing the collapse of the base in the breath mine.

Summary of Judgment

If the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base of the base.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 758 of the Civil Act, Article 5 of the Mining Safety Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Plaintiff 1 and six others

Defendant-Appellee

Korea Coal Corporation

original decision

Seoul High Court Decision 68Na2745 delivered on July 24, 1969

Text

The original judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Seoul High Court.

Reasons

As to the Plaintiffs’ grounds of appeal:

According to the purport of the oral argument and the facts established by the original judgment, the non-party, while doing so in the mine area owned by the defendant, has salved and salved by salved. The non-party's reasoning is that the non-party entered the workplace without the permission of the head of the working group at the time of the accident and put it into the workplace with heavy dynamics without the help of the post-san, and the accident caused the defects of the defendant's establishment (the failure to take security measures stipulated in Article 3 of the Mining Safety Act). However, if the non-party died due to the salvble roof accident such as recognition of the original judgment, the accident is presumed to have been caused by the defect of the defendant's establishment in the mine area, and even if the judgment was recognized by the non-party, even if the non-party was negligent, the non-party's negligence should be considered to have been caused by the non-party's fault, and it is reasonable to reverse the above defendant's mining establishment without any negligence.

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges pursuant to Article 406 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The two judges of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) the Red Net Sheet

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1969.7.24.선고 68나2745
본문참조조문
기타문서