Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for one year and two months, for one year and eight months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Western District Court on March 12, 2015 and was sentenced to two years of fraud

8.28 The above judgment became final and conclusive.

[2] Defendant C knew that Defendant C, as an authorized intermediary, intended to dispose of F’s L204 lending in the name of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H204, which is the wife, and provided that he recommended Defendant B, who was affiliated with the intermediary office, to purchase it, and settled the loan up to the intermediate payment on the ground of a good credit holder, and provided that he would be exempted from the balance after the transfer of ownership.

Accordingly, Defendant B, upon request of Defendant A, who is a relative by marriage, concluded a lease contract by pretending that Defendant A move into the above loan, and based on this, it was intended to obtain a loan from a financial right to receive a lease on a deposit basis.

Defendant

B, at the Defendant C’s I brokerage office located in the same Dong on October 18, 2013, written in the name of the Defendant A a lease agreement (before the lease agreement) under which the B would rent the loan from the above G to KRW 270 million.

In addition, on November 4, 11 of the same year through a loan consultant known to Defendant C by introduction, Defendant A established a neighboring pledge on the above leased deposit repayment claim, and entered into a loan transaction agreement with Defendant Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. with the victim Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. and received loans from the damaged party on the 19.189 million won of the same month under the condition that he/she continues to maintain the resident registration transferred to the above lending during the two-year loan period.

In fact, the defendant A pretended to the tenant upon the request of the defendant B, and therefore, the same month of the loan.

7. On the 22th of the same month, the moving-in report was filed, and there was no idea to rent the above lending during the lending period. Defendant B purchased the above lending in the name of J as her husband on the same day, set the maximum amount of KRW 234 million, and then used the lending amount of KRW 180 million from the Ansan Savings Bank for the remainder of purchase, etc.