logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.04.03 2013고합883
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for eight months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) entered into a contract with the Defendant, E, F, etc. to recruit the name “bab” and purchase the “bab” loan in the name of “bab” in Incheon; and (b) entered the false sales contract in which the amount of the loan was additionally refunded; and (c) made a written loan from the victim agricultural cooperatives (hereinafter “victim agricultural cooperatives”) to have the remainder of the purchase price and appropriated the remainder as the purchase price to divide the remainder; and (d) among them, the Defendant was in charge of supplying “bab”.

The Defendant, through one-person “G” and “H”, had access to I, and agreed to borrow the name “balm” under the condition of paying a certain price.

Around July 15, 2010, the Defendant, along with E, entered into a false real estate sales contract, with the owner’s agreement on the preparation of a “business contract” in which the purchase price is influored from JBL 202, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, as the purchaser, and entered the said I into a false real estate sales contract with the purchase price of KRW 130 million.

Since then, around August 10, 2010, E prepared the registration and loan application document for the above loan in his name, and applied for the registration of ownership transfer to the victim agricultural cooperative as the actual right holder, while I applied for the loan as if he applied for the above loan as a security for the above loan to the victim agricultural cooperative.

In collusion with E, F, etc., the Defendant received a total of KRW 2,263,00,000 from 20 to 19 April 201, 201, including by deceiving employees in charge of lending the victim agricultural cooperative loans, to receive KRW 75,00,00 from the account in the name of I on the same day.

2. Defendant B entered into a contract with F, M, E, etc. to purchase Incheon local loan in the name of “B” and purchase Incheon local loan in the name of “B” and then is higher than the actual purchase price.

arrow