logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.15 2017고단841
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 15, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months for criminal fraud in the Daejeon District Court's support around the Daejeon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 23th of the same month.

1. On April 18, 2007, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that “The Defendant, by making a phone call to the victim and lending KRW 5 million to the victim, the purchase cost of goods is insufficient, as the purchase cost of goods is insufficient.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use the borrowed money to repay the debt even if he borrowed money from the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the injured party because there was a situation where only the debt exceeds 30 million won without any particular property or income at the time.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million from the victim to the post office account in the name of the Defendant on the same day under the pretext of borrowing money from the victim, and acquired the money by remittance of KRW 34,90,000,000 from that time to September 12, 2007, as shown in attached Table 1.

2. The Defendant, on November 14, 2007, borrowed money from the victim to purchase goods necessary to purchase his/her clothes, at a Buddhist place located in Seoul around November 14, 2007.

“.............”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use the borrowed money to repay the debt even if he borrowed money from the injured party, and since the situation reaches only the debt amount of KRW 100 million without any specified property or income at the time, there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the injured party.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million from the victim to the post office account in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim, as the loan money, and as well as from that time until January 18, 2008.

arrow