logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.05.09 2017고단2390
사기
Text

Of the crimes No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, the defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the frauds listed in the attached Table No. 1, 2, and 3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On March 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment due to a violation of road traffic law (driving) at the Jeju District Court on March 20, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 23, 2014, and completed the enforcement of the sentence on October 27, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 12, 2013, the defrauded of the borrowed money: (a) the victim D (Woo 29 years of age) at Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Jeju on September 12, 2013, the Defendant would sell and purchase the borrowed money and make a full payment upon the completion of the pen.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the Defendant did not directly construct a pent or invest in a casino business in Jeju-do. At the time, the Defendant was only liable for a loan or credit card payment amounting to KRW 25 million to KRW 40 million, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to no particular property or income.

Nevertheless, the Defendant obtained 39,642,00 won in total as the borrowed money as stated above from the victim to the post office account (F) in the name of E as the borrowed money from the victim, and acquired 39,642,00 won from around that time to March 4, 2016.

2. On December 1, 2013, the Defendant shall obtain the credit card payment from the said victim at the same place as the above 1. Paragraph (1). However, if the credit card was lent to Jeju-do, it would be timely to settle the payment.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant was only liable for loans and credit card payments of 25 million won to 40 million won at the time, and the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price even if he was used with credit cards from the injured party due to no particular property or income.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, makes a false statement to the victim, has a modern card opened from the injured party.

arrow