1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On April 28, 2016, Plaintiff A and B were parents of the network D (hereinafter referred to as “the network”), and Plaintiff C were the deceased’s children. On the part of the deceased, the deceased joined the Defendant Company, and performed duties, such as calculation of employee pay, issuance of food rights, termination of value-added taxes, regular settlement settlement book, issuance of 4 major insurance, electric charges, rent, telephone charges, digital broadcast settlement items, output of manufacturer’s tax invoice, telephone reception, and telephone reception. (c) On June 21, 2016, the deceased was discovered in the actual condition from Defendant Company 1’s stairs, and was transferred to the emergency room of the 1st floor of the Defendant Company through the nearby E Hospital, and died of low fertility damage. [No dispute over recognition exists, any evidence set forth in subparagraphs 1 through 6, 31 through 3, 31, and 33 of the entire pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion, as an employer of the deceased, bear the legal duty to maintain the deceased's performance of his/her duties by strictly observing the environment and legal working hours suitable for his/her duties under the Labor Standards Act, and the duty to protect the deceased's life, body, and health as a legal duty to protect the deceased. In so doing, the deceased's failure to perform his/her duties led to the deceased's death due to stress by negligence, which caused the deceased's death due to his/her excessive duties. Therefore, the plaintiffs' damage compensation liability under the tort liability and employment

B. In full view of the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the deceased was killed by negligence of the Defendant Company, taking into account the following circumstances, which can be seen from the respective descriptions of Gap, Gap, 8, 10, 11, and Eul as well as the overall purport of the pleadings.

1 The Deceased worked for 36 days from May 2, 2016 to June 21, 2016 at the Defendant Company, including two times of holiday work, and work on ordinary day.