1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 27, 2015, the deceased E (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) was hospitalized in the Daegu KaTol University Hospital with the complete cryposis and the mathy flusium due to cerebral dystyphism, and received treatment in the new and rehabilitation medical department.

B. The Deceased shall have the same damage.

6. 13. The Defendant transferred the Defendant’s F hospital to the Defendant’s F hospital and received rehabilitation treatment, and the first time there is a nursing room, and later there is no nursing room, and the Defendant moved to the sick room with a joint nurse.

C. On October 30, 2015, the Deceased, who was walking the corridor of the Defendant Hospital, was suffering from the satisfying of the Woman’s Woman’s abandonment.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

On November 10 of the same year, the deceased was transferred to Daegu KaTol Hospital on the following day, and died on November 28 of the same year with a pulmonary dystysis and a parosis.

E. The Plaintiffs are the siblings and siblings of the Deceased.

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, each of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including virtual numbers), the inquiry results on the director of Daegu City University Hospital, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by moving the Deceased to a sick room with no nursing person and returning to the sick room at night. There was an accident, such as going beyond the stairs from the night before the accident of this case occurred and going beyond the bed, and before the accident of this case occurred. The Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by moving the Deceased to a sick room with a nursing person to prevent the Deceased from returning to the night in order to prevent the accident of this case.

Even though the accident of this case occurred due to negligence, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damage caused by the negligence.

B. According to the evidence No. 2-1 and No. 5 of the judgment of the deceased, the deceased exceeded the diversity of the deceased.