Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who was a pastor of the D church located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, and Defendant B is a family owner, the victim E is a member of the G church located in Daegu Suwon-gu F, the victim H is the head of the said G church, and the victim I sent the said G church to the Republic of the Philippines for missionary activities.

From 09:00 to 13:00 on August 24, 2014 and from 09:00 to 13:00 on the 31st day of the same month to 13:0 on the settlement and delivery of the above G church, the Defendants are passing through a large number of unspecified persons, and ① “I Line Teachers, H roads, and E companies are able to see the remaining land of the same, thereby leaving the mission center.”

A banner on the ground value of 1 billion 500,000,000,000 won, shall be posted, and 2. The "I is irrelevant to J, i, i.e., the stop stop-down of the I-board teacher who was involved in the scoppy obscenity, e.g., the scopic activity, or the scopic activity.

J is not an I to the extent that it is not an I.

” 고 기재된 팻말을 게시하고, ③ “ 성도님 들이라 면 10억의 땅을 도적맞고도 가만히 침묵할 수 있습니까

Doing that a teacher, a teacher, or a pastor is unable to engage in any such gambling act; and

E Dogs Dogl Dogl Dogl Dogl Dogl Dogl Dogl Dogl Dogl

체 칠은 : 도적질하지 말라“ 고 기재된 팻말을 게시하였다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to insult victims openly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. A complaint;

1. Application of statutes on police statements made to H to H;

1. Defendants of the pertinent legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 311 and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of punishment: Selection of a fine;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the assertion does not seem to be insulting to the victims, and is somewhat somewhat somewhat somewhat.