logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.10.23 2019노1036
위증
Text

All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the evidence presented by the Prosecutor, with respect to the obstruction of performance of official duties against the Jeonju District Court 2016 Godan2299 G, the aforementioned G merely went beyond the bridge of Defendant A, and it is evident that there was no brupting of Defendant A’s title.

Nevertheless, on April 25, 2017, the Defendants appeared as a witness and taken an oath, and Defendant A testified as if G had dried up with the Defendant’s title around October 13, 2016, and Defendant B testified as if G had obviously observed the Defendant’s title around October 13, 2016. Thus, the judgment of the court below that acquitted the Defendant is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles.

2. The summary of the facts charged of the instant case is a police officer who was on duty under the jurisdiction of the Jeonju Police Station C police box, and the Defendants were arrested as a flagrant offender against the suspected crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, after receiving a report of 112 on October 13, 2016 that a traffic accident occurred on October 13, 2016, and called to the Donsan-gu D apartment E-dong parking lot at the time of Jeonju-si, Busan-si, and called up for F and Sin-si at

Defendant

A around 15:00 on April 25, 2017, at the Criminal Court of Jeonju District Court No. 1, the former District Court No. 2016Kadan2299, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above court’s obstruction of performance of official duties against G, and taken an oath, and the prosecutor presented the witness’s statement to the Defendant, and the prosecutor presented the witness’s statement to the Defendant, “I am pregnant as I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I

‘The purpose of this case’ is to say that the timber was bleeped, but this is not true.

I ask "I", "I", e.g.

I have the honor to go beyond my consideration.

Therefore, such.

arrow