logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.13 2013가합85924
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant E is a licensed real estate agent who operates the real estate brokerage office as a licensed real estate agent, and Defendant F is Defendant D’s wife.

(b) issuing and selling its membership certificates; 1) Company G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”);

A) around 2003, at H Japan in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, a new apartment construction project (hereinafter “the project”) in the manner of a regional housing association is the project of this case.

(A) the “I Regional Housing Association” (hereinafter referred to as the “Association”) is the instant association’s.

2) A member of the National Bank (hereinafter “National Bank”) account (Account Number: J) in Defendant D’s name, deposited KRW 10 million in the purchase price of the instant member’s membership certificate as of March 14, 2008, and KRW 48 million on March 19, 2008, respectively. The depositor is K, and on March 19, 2008, a member of the Association was issued a certificate of membership as K.

3) On March 30, 2008, Plaintiff B paid KRW 10 million to Defendant D with the purchase price for the instant membership certificate, deposited KRW 45,500,000 on the National Bank Account (Account Number M) in the name of Defendant D and E, and received one copy of the membership certificate of this case as indicated in Defendant D and E on April 3, 2008, from Defendant D and E on June 3, 2008, Plaintiff C purchased KRW 60,000,000,000,000 from Defendant D’s account, and Defendant F sent this to Defendant D.

In addition, on June 27, 2008, Defendant D, through Defendant F, issued to Plaintiff C one copy of the membership certificate of this case where the membership member was N.

C. On the other hand, the head of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government established a basic plan for housing redevelopment improvement project on June 25, 2004, including most of the land subject to the project of the union of this case, and P on November 22, 2004.

arrow