logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2018.03.27 2017고정137
실화
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be three million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a field manager E.

around 08:09 on April 12, 2017, the Defendant used electricity in the field of GFF located in North Korea-U.S., GFF. In order to reinforce the astronomical work.

In such cases, in spite of the duty of care to sprink the processed matter to other places, it was neglected to prevent it from sprinking to the other places, and thus, the plastic house was destroyed by sponsing the plastic house of the head of the tombstone owned by the National Agricultural Cooperative in the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Witness of H;

1. On the ground that the Defendant’s negligence is recognized as having been found to have been committed by the Defendant, who was not equipped with the equipment to remove the sloping in a vinyl while the Defendant was working on the sloping (the contact work is highly likely to cause fire due to its characteristics, and the distance between the place where the Defendant was working and the place where the Defendant appears to be the starting point of the work (the starting point of the work) and the place where the processed dust is seen to be the starting point of the work, and the fire is likely to occur if the processed dust is cut down on the substance thereof). The mere fact that there were many expenses to remove the sloping, to take measures to prevent the sloping from sloping, or to take such measures is not included in the contract cannot be deemed to have been committed against the Defendant.

In addition, the element of the crime of realization under Article 170 (1) of the Criminal Act is "a fire by negligence to another person's building". Thus, the alteration of the charge to the extent that it does not infringe the defendant's right to defense (the alteration to "a vinyl") and the value of a greenhouse destroyed or the cost of repairing it constitutes the element of the formation. The evidence submitted alone does not recognize that the value of a vinyl house destroyed or the appropriate cost of repairing it is the same as that of the charge.

arrow