Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who performed electrical work at the new construction site of DD located in C at the time of racing.

On November 25, 2015, the Defendant used electricity for the reinforcement of the lower end of the window frame of the DNA outer wall at the construction site around November 25, 2015.

In the vicinity of the area adjacent to the area, there are shot pumps, and there may be a fire where the processed matter generated in the course of shots can be protruding to the shot pumps. Thus, a person shots must take measures to ensure that the processed matter is not protruding to the shot pumps, and pay attention, such as checking whether the processed matter was carried to the shot pumps in the case where the shots were protruding.

그럼에도 피고 인은 위 장소에서 전기용접을 하면서 우레탄폼에 불똥이 튀는 것을 완전히 차단하지 않고, 전기용접 후 우레탄폼에 튄 불똥이 발화하고 있는지를 철저히 확인하지 않은 채 다른 곳으로 이동하였다.

피고 인의 위와 같은 과실로 인하여 그 무렵 우레탄폼에 튄 불똥이 발화하여 불이 붙었고, 같은 날 16:20 경 그 불이 D 외벽 강판 패널 70㎡ 및 그곳에 설치된 에어컨 실외 기 5대에 번져, 이를 모두 태워 소훼하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the report on the occurrence of a fire, the report on the results of field identification, the report on the assessment of legal safety, the survey report on fire fighting, the survey report on the scene of a fire, the appraisal report on D new construction works fire case, and the technical guidelines for the prevention of fire at the time of a

1. Article 170 (1) and Article 166 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant, at the time of the contact, performed his duty of care not only to move the processed matter to another place, but also to check whether the fire occurred at the time of the end of the contact. As such, the Defendant’s Contact act was committed by the Defendant.