The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Since the front side of Chapter 2 (F, D, hereinafter referred to as “the reproduction paper of this case”) which the Defendant printed out by mistake of facts falls under the crime of forgery of currency and the crime of uttering of counterfeited currency because it is obvious that the paper paper of this case has the appearance to be mistaken for pneumoconiosis, and thus constitutes a forged currency in the crime of forgery of currency and the crime of uttering of counterfeited currency, the court below erred by misapprehending facts and acquitted the charges of forgery of currency and uttering of forged currency.

B. The crime of this case of unfair sentencing is a serious crime that infringes on the social legal interests, such as the safety of monetary transactions and the credibility of currency, and thus requires strict punishment. However, the punishment imposed by the court below (4 months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution) is too unffortunate and unfair, since the Defendant copied the front and rear sides of 5,000 won, and then forged 5,000 won right, which is well-known in a closed size, and paid one of them at taxi charges.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대하여 1) 통화위조 및 위조통화행사 부분의 공소사실 가) 피고인은 2012. 7. 4. 15:00경 김해시 E에 있는 피고인의 집에서 행사할 목적으로 엡손(EPSON) 컬러프린트기를 이용하여 미리 가지고 있던 한국은행권 5,000원권 지폐 2장(F, D)의 각 앞, 뒷면을 컬러복사하는 방법으로 이를 위조하였다.

B) On July 6, 2012, around 17:00, the Defendant issued one of the copies of the instant case to C, a taxi engineer, at taxi rates, at the bus stops located in the Busan Eastdong-gu, Busan, and exercised it. The lower court’s judgment is 2).