logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.23 2017가단5109185
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A, KRW 78,454,30, and KRW 1,000,000 and each of the said amounts.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Plaintiff A and Defendant E are Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”).

(2) On June 3, 2014, Plaintiff A and Defendant E had been carrying boxes (not less than four boxes, not less than 10-15 km per piece, and 10-15 km per piece) containing plastic packaging materials in the freezing storage of Defendant D, E (see evidence 1 of E; hereinafter referred to as “ELC”) from the freezing warehouse of Echeon-si, E-si, E (2) around June 11, 2014, before the door (see evidence 4 B/ 4) moving from the freezing warehouse of Defendant D to the shipment room.

At the time, the plaintiff Gap and the defendant Eul stopped the above door to the outside of the open door, and it is impossible to move because several arms are loaded to the outside of the open door and they are loaded to the outside of the open door. Thus, the defendant Eul transferred the above part to the above part for the moving of the above part. In this case, the plaintiff Gap suffered from the injury of the left part of the left part of the car and the back part of the above part of the exit door, such as the pressure damage and the damage of the escape, the damage of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the part, the removal of the upper part of the part of the upper part of the part, and the removal of the part of the part of the upper part of the part of the body of the plaintiff Eul.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) Plaintiff B is the father of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the mother of Plaintiff A. [based on recognition] without dispute, Plaintiff 1-3 evidence, Eul 1-4, and 8 evidence (including the branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

- The purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition and limitation 1 above, Defendant E neglected to check the rear side while driving the vehicle, and caused injury to Plaintiff A due to negligence, and thus, Defendant E is liable to compensate for the damage suffered by the Defendants due to the instant accident pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act.

In addition, Defendant D as an employer of Defendant E, who is an employee pursuant to Article 756(1) of the Civil Act, the Plaintiff during the performance of his duties.

arrow