1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 43,885,832 to Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 3,00,000 to Plaintiff C; and (c) from June 16, 2012 to each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) Plaintiff A (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff” is to be identified as Korean name, and Plaintiff B was employed as an employee in product packing work around June 16, 201, and the victim of the following accident is the victim himself/herself, Plaintiff D is his/her spouse, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with Nonparty ELS Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the owner of the following accident. (2) On June 16, 2012, the Plaintiff was going to the left side of the central passage in the company in order to attend an inquiry at around 07:48, while the Plaintiff was driving the above cooperation company, which is an employee of ELS, to transport the product again, and then failed to discover the Plaintiff’s walking along the right side of the central road in the same direction as prefabricated, and did not remove the Plaintiff’s pelvis and the left side side of the pelvis.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2, 4, 7 through 9, Eul evidence 3 and video (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the above accident as an insurer for the above-mentioned vehicle.

C. However, the limitation of liability is limited, although the plaintiff was aware that the plaintiff had a train in the workplace is in operation, so that he had a duty of care to confirm the direction of the vehicle in which he had walking or operating out of the way of his own, and avoid the accident, and thereby, he was walking to the central passage without due care.