The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

With respect to each insult of the attached list 3 of the facts charged in the instant case, the first instance court is difficult to regard the victim’s personal value as an insulting speech that could objectively undermine the social evaluation of the victim’s personal value, or it does not violate the social rules even if there is room to regard the victim as a somewhat inappropriate speech.

In light of the fact that innocence was pronounced, the lower court maintained the first instance judgment.

Even in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on insult, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.