1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,322,329 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from March 23, 2012 to January 15, 2016, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s intermediate freight B (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”).

2) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity which has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to a C-city bus (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

B. On March 23, 2012, when the Defendant’s vehicle driven by D is running along the two-lanes of the two-lane road in front of the F cafeteria in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, the accident that the rear part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle parked in the center of the two-lane is being driven by the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

) A. [A] evidence Nos. 3 (A., No. 8-1, and No. 2 (Traffic Accident Report), etc. to the effect that the Plaintiff’s vehicle immediately before the instant accident was in progress at a speed of 51 to 60km, not at the time the Plaintiff’s vehicle was stopped, and that the Plaintiff’s vehicle immediately before the instant accident was in progress at a speed of 51 to 60km.

그러나 이 사건 사고 당시의 현장 모습이 담긴 동영상인 을 제1호증(동영상 화면)의 영상에 의하면 이 사건 사고 직전 피고 차량이 원고 차량을 향하여 매우 빠르게 접근하였고, 그 충격으로 말미암아 원고 차량이 상당한 거리까지 튕겨 나갔던 사실, 별지 ‘사진’ 목록에서 보이는 원고 차량으로부터 도로 표면에 반사된 불빛이 동영상에서 볼 때 피고 차량과의 충돌 전까지 별다른 변화 없이 일정한 형태를 유지하였던 사실을 알 수 있다.

In addition, considering the fact that even according to the above traffic accident report, the defendant vehicle was in progress at a speed of 61 to 70 km per hour, it is difficult to view that the plaintiff vehicle was in progress at a speed of 51 to 60 km per hour, which is not sufficient in and out of the defendant vehicle, at a speed of 51 to 60 km per hour. Rather, the plaintiff vehicle was stopped at the time.