logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.07.05 2013고단2280
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On January 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and order to attend a course at the Gwangju District Court on January 24, 2013, and is currently under suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on February 1, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 20:00 on May 15, 2013, the Defendant driven C Poter truck with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.161% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license on the section of approximately 1 km in front of the C Poter and the road front of the same military rooftop, but passing through the Roman on the same day, at around 22:15, the Defendant driven C Poter truck with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.161%, without obtaining a driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reports on each traffic accident and photographs on each accident site;

1. Statement on the circumstances of the driver, report on the detection of the driver, and report on the driver;

1. Inquiry of driver's licenses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, inquiry reports;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 2, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Article 40 and Article 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Commercial Concurrent Crimes") committed another crime while being under suspension of the execution due to the reason of sentencing, driving under influence without license, and driving without license. Thus, the sentence of this case is inevitable. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, taking into account the drinking volume of this case, Defendant's health status, family relationship, degree of reflect

arrow