logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2021.02.04 2018재노1 (1)
강도살인등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A Pronouncement of sentence shall be suspended for A.

Defendant

Of the facts charged against A.

Reasons

1. According to the progress records of the case, the following facts are acknowledged.

A. On December 6, 1991, the Defendants were indicted on the charges of false status as public official, violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and violation of the Road Traffic Act by the Busan District Court 91 High Court 8619, Dec. 30, 1991 as to the Defendants’ robbery, robbery, robbery, robbery, special robbery, and confinement as Busan District Court 91 High Court 1305, respectively.

B. On January 6, 1992, the court of original judgment rendered a ruling that the above case No. 8619 was consolidated with the above case No. 91 high-level 8619 on 91 high-level 1305 on 91 high-level 8619, and found the Defendants guilty of all the facts charged against the Defendants on August 11, 1992 after the merger of the case No. 91 high-level 8619, the case No. 92 high-level 14) and ordered the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor for life, for crimes No. 2 and 3 (No. 92 high-level 1305, the case) of the judgment of the Defendant A, and for the Defendant B, imprisonment with prison labor for life.

(c)

The Defendants and the Prosecutor appealed to the judgment of the court below on the Busan High Court No. 92No. 1125, but during the appellate trial, the court reversed the part concerning the crime No. 1 and the part concerning the Defendant B as stated in the judgment of the court below and sentenced the Defendants to imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes No. 2 and No. 3 as stated in the judgment of the court below on Jan. 7, 1993, and dismissed the appeal by the Defendants A and the Prosecutor on the part concerning the crime No. 2 and No. 3 as stated in the judgment of the court below (hereinafter referred to as “the judgment subject to a retrial”).

The Defendants appealed to the Supreme Court Decision 93Do356 on April 27, 1993, and the Supreme Court dismissed the Defendants’ final appeal on April 27, 1993, which became final and conclusive as it is.

E. Defendants are the Busan District Court on May 8, 2017.

arrow