1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasons why the court should explain this case is "2.A" of the first instance judgment.

(2) As set forth in subparagraph 2-A(b) below, the part concerning “a summary of the allegation relating to the scope of damages” as set forth in subparagraph 2-B below.

as provided in subsection 4.b.

(2) As set forth in Section 2(c) below, the part regarding “the lawsuit of April 5, 200” is as follows:

as provided in subsection 4. D.

The part on the Defendants’ assertion of mutual aid is “4. D. Determination as to the Defendants’ assertion of mutual aid and deposit.” The part on “the long-term indemnity” of the 11th page 7 is “the long-term indemnity project”, “the part on “each party” of the 13th page 9, “the joint act” of the 20th page 6, and “the act of illegality” of the 20th page 6, respectively, and the part on “the act of illegality” of the 19th page 7 and the 4.2th page 4.2 as follows.

Defendant’s 23 pages 1, 23’s 3’s “(1)” in front of “,” 7’s “Plaintiffs” in front of “A 10,” and the following 3’s 9 and 10’s 3’s 3’s 10.

In addition to adding each claim, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. (2) In the first place, the Plaintiff did not delay the payment of the purchase price, and the Defendants leaked personal information to Solomon Credit Information Co., Ltd., a third party without the Plaintiff’s consent to delay of the Plaintiff’s personal information and the sales price. Therefore, the Defendants are liable to pay consolation money as compensation for the Plaintiff’s emotional distress pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act.

Preliminary, the defendants' provision of the plaintiff's personal information to Solomon Credit Information is legitimate, and the personal information provided does not include the part that the plaintiff defaulted on the payment of the purchase price, and the documents that the plaintiff's payment of the purchase price was overdue due to the error of Solomon Credit Information.