logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.18 2015나32877
공사대금
Text

1. The appeal on the counterclaim of the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the principal lawsuit of the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "The defendant's factory at each head office of the defendant B shall be changed to "the factory at the location of the head office of the defendant B"; "The plaintiff and the defendants agreed to pay the construction cost to the plaintiff instead of the defendant C after entering into the contract for the construction work of this case;" "15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings" at the last 6th place "the date of pleadings at the first instance court is closed on September 9, 2015," and "the part of the first instance court's decision's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance court's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's second instance judgment' and second appeal's second appeal'.

2. The changed part

(a) Section 2-(b)(i) of the grounds for the judgment of the first instance.

arrow