logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.01.20 2016나2035688
매매대금반환 등
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is that the court of first instance shall dismiss " July 1, 2004" of the second 17th e.g., "204." of the first e.g., "17 and 18" of the same e.g., "the contract of this case" (hereinafter "the contract of this case") and add "C." in the third e.g., "the plaintiff" in the first e. 1 and 2 e., "the land of this case" in the same e.g., "the land of this case (the ownership transfer registration of the defendant's name was completed on May 23, 2004 e.g., "the 6th e., the e., the 1st e., the e., the e., the e., the 1st e., the e., the e., "Y 17th e., the e., the e., the 17th e., the e., the e., the 1000000.

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. Each entry of evidence Nos. 14, 17, 18, and 7 included in the evidence No. 14, 17, and 7 included in the table Nos. 4, 6, and 7 indicated in the judgment of the court of first instance, while the expenses that the Plaintiff spent in relation to the land of this case to be borne by the Defendant, are examined in the above quoted part.

arrow