Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 11, 2017, the Defendant damaged public goods on the front of “E” located in Pyeongtaek-siD, and reported on the 112-way road in front of “E” used for drinking drinking drinking water, and damaged the Defendant to have approximately KRW 44,00,00 of the repair cost of the 1st patrol vehicle, on the ground that the Defendant’s slope belonging to the F District of Pyeongtaek-si Police Station, who was called up after having received a report on the 112-round 18:05, on the ground that he would attempt to have the Defendant returned home.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the same time, at the same place as paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, and at the same time, assaulted, such as putting the flaps of the H in hand, which prevents the Defendant from walking the flabing of the flab while under the influence of alcohol, and placing the drinking on the face

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to H and G by the police;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs and estimates;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Articles 136 (1) and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the following: (a) the Defendant’s mistake committed by contingently, and the police officer’s failure to punish the Defendant; and (b) the police officer’s failure to punish the Defendant.