A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2014, at around 01:40, the Defendant was assaulted on the road in front of the D restaurant located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Songpa-gu, by reporting 112, and was dispatched by F, who was demanded by F to have the victim not want to be punished because the victim did not want to be punished, and the Defendant expressed to F, “I am out, Chewing imple, and who was unable to keep a large criminal and have a large number of shots, I am to be used by the public prosecutor,” and assaulted F at one time as drinking the left side of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the F of each police protocol of statement to the F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The balance of recommendations based on the sentencing guidelines under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the absence of previous convictions related to the same kind of power or violence, the occurrence of contingent crimes, and the degree of violence, etc.): The basic area of the type of obstruction of performance of official duties (6 to 14 months);