A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2016, around 19:30, the Defendant suffered domestic violence damage at around 17:30 on the same day by the Defendant’s wife at around 17:30 on the same day before the Defendant’s house located in Seopopopo City C apartment 102, 503, and was unable to enter the house by altering the password of the entrance of the residential area, and the entrance was cut off with hand and cut off.

The Defendant reported 112 to the effect that the domestic violence case occurred, and sent to the police box affiliated with the police box that called “this sponse, when he became aware of,” and sponsed the title of the above E by hand, and assaulted the KON where the above E was carried.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the dispatch of 112 reported police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (on-site conditions at the same time);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Community service order: Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Bearing litigation costs: It shall be decided as per the Disposition for the reasons under Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

Reasons for sentencing (within the range of the recommended sentencing guidelines) Basic Area of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties: The circumstances unfavorable to June -1 April: 8 previous years and fines related to violence;