logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.02.02 2016고단1153
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 28, 2016, from around 18:30 to 19:30 the same day, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in the “EKafbook” operated by the victim D in Switzerland-si; (b) without any justifiable reason, the Defendant was the customer “I n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n kn n n n n kn n n n kn n kn n n kn n n

It interfered with the victim's carpet business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as driving a large interest.

2. On August 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault by the Defendant, at the G District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District Districting the Defendant voluntarily accompanied by H, who had been voluntarily accompanied by the said District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District District

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties against the offender of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with H and D;

1. A written statement of the I;

1. Application of relevant photographs, investigative reports (on-site images), CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Two crimes (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) consisting of the basic areas (six months to one year and six months) of the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines (Obstruction of Duties) [the scope of the recommended punishment] of the basic areas (including six months to one year and six months), the scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment] of the basic areas (six months to one year and six months) of the Act on the Regulation of the Punishment of Specific Crimes (Interference with Performance of Official Duties] (the scope of the recommended punishment] of the basic areas (six months to one year and six months) of the Act on the Regulation of the Punishment of Specific Crimes (the person subject to special sentencing].

arrow